Journal Home
Search for

Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 82-99 (January 2007)


View previous. 18 of 21 View next.

The Prevalence of Symptoms in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review

Fliss E.M. MurtaghaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Julia Addington-Hallb, Irene J. Higginsona

Symptoms in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are underrecognized. Prevalence studies have focused on single symptoms rather than on the whole range of symptoms experienced. This systematic review aimed to describe prevalence of all symptoms, to better understand total symptom burden. Extensive database, “gray literature,” and hand searches were undertaken, by predefined protocol, for studies reporting symptom prevalence in ESRD populations on dialysis, discontinuing dialysis, or without dialysis. Prevalence data were extracted, study quality assessed by use of established criteria, and studies contrasted/combined to show weighted mean prevalence and range. Fifty-nine studies in dialysis patients, one in patients discontinuing dialysis, and none in patients without dialysis met the inclusion criteria. For the following symptoms, weighted mean prevalence (and range) were fatigue/tiredness 71% (12% to 97%), pruritus 55% (10% to 77%), constipation 53% (8% to 57%), anorexia 49% (25% to 61%), pain 47% (8% to 82%), sleep disturbance 44% (20% to 83%), anxiety 38% (12% to 52%), dyspnea 35% (11% to 55%), nausea 33% (15% to 48%), restless legs 30% (8%to 52%), and depression 27% (5%to 58%). Prevalence variations related to differences in symptom definition, period of prevalence, and level of severity reported. ESRD patients on dialysis experience multiple symptoms, with pain, fatigue, pruritus, and constipation in more than 1 in 2 patients. In patients discontinuing dialysis, evidence is more limited, but it suggests they too have significant symptom burden. No evidence is available on symptom prevalence in ESRD patients managed conservatively (without dialysis). The need for greater recognition of and research into symptom prevalence and causes, and interventions to alleviate them, is urgent.

a Department of Palliative Care and Policy, Kings College London, London, UK

b School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Fliss Murtagh, MRCGP, MSc, Department of Palliative Care and Policy, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Rd, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.

 The work was funded by Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Charity.

PII: S1548-5595(06)00163-7

doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2006.10.001


View previous. 18 of 21 View next.