Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
Volume 14, Issue 2 , Pages 206-211 , April 2007

Ethical Considerations Regarding Pregnancy in Chronic Kidney Disease

  • Sara N. Davison

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Sara N. Davison, MD, Division of Nephrology and Immunology, University of Alberta, 11-107 Clinical Sciences Building Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G3 Canada.

References 

  1. Etchells E, Sharpe G, Walsh P, et al. Bioethics for clinicians: 1 (Consent). CMAJ. 1996;155:177–180
  2. Bagon JA, Vernaeve H, De Muylder X, et al. Pregnancy and dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;31:756–765
  3. Okundaye I, Abrinko P, Hou S. Registry of pregnancy in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;31:766–773
  4. Ross LF. Ethical considerations related to pregnancy in transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1313–1316
  5. Toma H, Tanabe K, Tokumoto T, et al. Pregnancy in women receiving renal dialysis or transplantation in Japan: A nationwide survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:1511–1516
  6. Hou S. Modification of dialysis regimens for pregnancy. Int J Artif Organs. 2002;25:823–826
  7. Armenti VT, Radomski JS, Moritz MJ, et al. Report from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR): Outcomes of pregnancy after transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2002;121–130
  8. Armenti VT, Moritz MJ, Davison JM. Drug safety issues in pregnancy following transplantation and immunosuppression: Effects and outcomes. Drug Saf. 1998;19:219–232
  9. Holley JL, Schmidt RJ, Bender FH, et al. Gynecologic and reproductive issues in women on dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;29:685–690
  10. Hope T, Lockwood G, Lockwood M. An ethical debate: Should older women be offered in vitro fertilisation? (The interests of the potential child). BMJ. 1995;310:1455–1456
  11. Kass NE. Policy, ethics, and reproductive choice: Pregnancy and childbearing among HIV-infected women. Acta Paediatr. 1994;400(suppl):95–98
  12. Flagler E, Baylis F, Rodgers S. Bioethics for clinicians: 12 (Ethical dilemmas that arise in the care of pregnant woman: Rethinking “maternal-fetal conflicts”). CMAJ. 1997;156:1729–1732
  13. Statman D. The right to parenthood: An argument for a narrow interpretation. Ethical Perspect. 2003;10:224–235
  14. Robertson JA. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994;
  15. McKneally MF, Dickens BM, Meslin EM, et al. Bioethics for clinicians: 13 (Resource allocation). CMAJ. 1997;157:163–167
  16. Lessan-Pezeshki M. Pregnancy after renal transplantation: Points to consider. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:703–707
  17. Peterson MM. Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access issues. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:280–285
  18. Shickle D, Donnelly P, Hopkins S, et al. Should older woman be offered in vitro fertilisation? (Counselling may be a better use of resources). BMJ. 1995;311:689–690
  19. Zerner J, Doil KL, Drewry J, et al. Intrauterine contraceptive device features in renal transplant patients. J Reprod Med. 1981;26:99–102

PII: S1548-5595(07)00011-0

doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2007.01.010

Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
Volume 14, Issue 2 , Pages 206-211 , April 2007

Article Tools