Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 39-47, January 2009

Imaging in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Stone Patients

  • Mrinal Dhar

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Mrinal Dhar, MD, Division of Urology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4V2.
  • ,
  • John D. Denstedt

Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

Imaging has an essential role in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with stone disease. A variety of imaging modalities are available to the practicing urologist, including conventional radiography (KUB), intravenous urography (IVU), ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance urography, and computed tomography (CT) scans, each with its advantages and limitations. Traditionally, IVU was considered the gold standard for diagnosing renal calculi, but this modality has largely been replaced by unenhanced spiral CT scans at most centers. Renal US is recommended as the initial imaging modality for suspected renal colic in pregnant women and children, but recent literature suggests that a low-dose CT scan may be safe in pregnancy. Intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy or US plays a large part in assisting the urologist with the surgical intervention chosen for the individual stone patient. Posttreatment imaging of stone patients is recommended to ensure complete fragmentation and stone clearance. Plain radiography is suggested for the follow-up of radiopaque stones, with ultrasound and limited IVU reserved for the follow-up of radiolucent stones to minimize cumulative radiation exposure from repeated CT scans. Patients with asymptomatic calyceal stones who prefer an observational approach should have a yearly KUB to monitor progression of stone burden. Current research has been aimed toward the development of a micro-CT scan and coherent-scatter analysis to determine stone composition in vivo. This may have a significant impact on the future clinical management of renal calculi by facilitating selection of the most appropriate surgical intervention based on stone composition at the time of presentation.

Index Words: Imaging, Urolithiasis, Diagnosis, Treatment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1548-5595(08)00169-9

doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2008.10.005

Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 39-47, January 2009